Caster Semenya Wins: European Court Rules Unfair Gender Test Trial

Caster Semenya, South Africa’s celebrated middle-distance runner, has faced a tough legal battle since 2018. World Athletics introduced strict regulations that require female athletes with high testosterone levels to lower them in order to compete. These rules prevented Semenya from racing in her preferred 800m event.

However, a recent ruling from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has brought new hope for the athlete’s fight. The court declared that Swiss courts had failed to provide Semenya with a fair trial, marking a crucial moment in her long-running legal saga.

The Background: What’s At Stake?

Since 2018, Semenya, who has a condition known as “differences in sexual development” (DSDs), has been unable to race in the 800m without lowering her testosterone levels. World Athletics imposed these rules, claiming that higher testosterone levels might give some female athletes an unfair advantage.

Semenya, a double Olympic gold medalist, has refused to comply. She argues that these regulations infringe on her basic rights and her ability to compete as a woman. Her legal journey has taken her through several international tribunals, including the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), which upheld the rules. Despite these setbacks, Semenya has continued to fight.

The European Court’s Ruling: Fair Trial Denied

On July 10, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that Swiss courts had failed to provide Semenya with a fair trial. The case began with the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s 2019 decision, which supported World Athletics’ regulations. The Swiss Federal Court validated this ruling in 2020, arguing that high testosterone levels gave female athletes a competitive edge.

However, the European Court found that the Swiss courts had not thoroughly examined Semenya’s case. The ruling emphasized that, given the serious nature of the case, Semenya deserved a more rigorous judicial review. The court also stated that Semenya had not been afforded the legal safeguards necessary for such an important case.

The court ordered Switzerland to pay Semenya 80,000 euros (around R1.6 million) for her legal expenses. Yet, the court did not address her claims of discrimination, as they were not admissible under Swiss law.

What Does This Mean for Semenya?

While the ruling is a victory in terms of fairness, it does not directly change Semenya’s situation. She will still need to lower her testosterone levels to compete in the 800m event. However, this decision is significant because it points to a flawed legal process.

The ruling does not overturn the regulations imposed by World Athletics, but it calls attention to the unfair trial Semenya underwent in Switzerland. This may open the door for further legal challenges to these controversial regulations.

Semenya’s Continued Fight for Equality

Semenya’s legal battle goes beyond sports. It has sparked broader debates about the treatment of athletes with differences in sexual development and the definitions of gender in athletics. The European Court’s decision could pave the way for more inclusive policies, as it highlights the importance of fair trials and the protection of athletes’ rights.

Although Semenya has yet to return to her 800m race without medication, this ruling strengthens her position and highlights the need for reforms in how athletics bodies treat athletes with unique biological characteristics.

Looking Ahead: What’s Next for Semenya?

Semenya’s fight for fairness is far from over. While the European Court’s ruling is important, it does not immediately restore her ability to race freely in the 800m category. However, it does set a precedent for future cases. Semenya and her legal team will continue to challenge the regulations in hopes of creating a fairer environment for all athletes, regardless of their natural characteristics.

The ruling also raises important questions about gender, fairness, and human rights in sports. Athletes like Semenya are changing the conversation about what it means to compete as a woman in sports, and this case could have far-reaching implications for the future of athletics.

Check also: Banyana Banyana Eye Victory Over Tanzania in WAFCON 2025

The European Court of Human Rights’ decision marks a critical moment in Caster Semenya’s fight for justice. While it does not immediately change her ability to compete without medical intervention, it acknowledges the unfairness in her legal battle. Semenya’s case is not just about athletics; it’s about ensuring that all athletes are treated equally, no matter their biological makeup. As her legal journey continues, the world will watch closely to see how this case reshapes the future of sports.